CPU Benchmarks of our OpenVZ VPS – OVZ 2

Some clients have been asking what kind of CPU Performance are they going to get on our OpenVZ VPS, so we have run a UNIX BENCH benchmark test on our OVZ 2 VPS Package, it is based on OpenVZ VPS, here are the results:

# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #

Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Process Creation 1 2 3

2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: testoz1.hosteons.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 3.16.0 — #1 SMP Thu Aug 23 19:33:51 MSK 2018
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″, collate=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″)
CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6380 (4999.7 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6380 (4999.7 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET
04:24:20 up 6 days, 18:18, 2 users, load average: 0.23, 0.07, 0.06; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 12 2018 04:24:20 – 04:52:30
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 22619374.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3233.0 MWIPS (9.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1490.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 153456.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 68924.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 202986.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 662230.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 90749.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3787.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4338.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 917.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 729809.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 22619374.6 1938.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3233.0 587.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 1490.2 346.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 153456.6 387.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 68924.5 416.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 202986.9 350.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 662230.0 532.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 90749.7 226.9
Process Creation 126.0 3787.6 300.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4338.3 1023.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 917.6 1529.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 729809.3 486.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 540.1

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 12 2018 04:52:30 – 05:20:43
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 44297471.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6438.9 MWIPS (9.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3507.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 357521.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 107359.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 887247.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1286635.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 188723.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 7108.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7069.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 954.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1131972.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 44297471.7 3795.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6438.9 1170.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 3507.1 815.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 357521.7 902.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 107359.1 648.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 887247.1 1529.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1286635.9 1034.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 188723.0 471.8
Process Creation 126.0 7108.3 564.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7069.3 1667.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 954.4 1590.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1131972.2 754.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1049.7

======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======

VPS Benchmark Results at Hosteons.com

We have been posting benchmark results for new VPS Nodes just like other VPS providers but a new VPS Node is definitely going to have good results but what are the benchmark results once more and more VPS/users are added to the VPS Node  ? So to be transparent with our clients we gave it a try on our VPS Node 1 i.e. our First VPS Node and since it’s our First VPS Node it is already full and we are not adding any new clients to it unless some VPS on it gets cancelled, here are the benchmark results:

我们一直在发布新VPS节点的基准测试结果,就像其他VPS提供商一样,但新的VPS节点肯定会有很好的结果,但是一旦越来越多的VPS /用户被添加到VPS节点,什么是基准测试结果? 因此,为了与我们的客户保持透明,我们尝试了我们的VPS节点1,即我们的第一个VPS节点,因为它是我们的第一个VPS节点,它已经满了,我们不会添加任何新的客户端,除非它上面的一些VPS被取消 ,这是基准测试结果:

———————————————————————-
Superbench.sh — https://www.oldking.net/350.html
Mode : Standard Version : 1.1.0
Usage : wget -qO- git.io/superbench.sh | bash
———————————————————————-
CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU Cores : 1 Cores @ 2793.000 MHz x86_64
CPU Cache : 4096 KB
OS : CentOS 7.5.1804 (64 Bit) KVM
Kernel : 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
Total Space : 9.4 GB (4.1 GB Used)
Total RAM : 991 MB (58 MB Used 395 MB Buff)
Total SWAP : 511 MB (0 MB Used)
Uptime : 15 days 0 hour 21 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
ASN & ISP : AS40676, Psychz Networks
Organization : Psychz Networks
Location : Los Angeles, United States / US
Region : California
———————————————————————-
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 491 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 520 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 454 MB/s
Average I/O Speed : 488.3 MB/s
———————————————————————-
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 42.70 Mbit/s 53.34 Mbit/s 194.569 ms
Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 91.4 Mbit/s 0.000 ms
Shanghai CT 12.69 Mbit/s 43.72 Mbit/s 176.677 ms
Hangzhou CT 63.30 Mbit/s 54.64 Mbit/s 161.807 ms
Shanghai CU 24.44 Mbit/s 47.07 Mbit/s 210.158 ms
Xi’an CU 30.34 Mbit/s 47.83 Mbit/s 295.071 ms
Chongqing CU 34.34 Mbit/s 35.19 Mbit/s 197.504 ms
Chengdu CM 6.38 Mbit/s 6.91 Mbit/s 475.345 ms
Kunming CM 1.68 Mbit/s 4.92 Mbit/s 257.47 ms
———————————————————————-
Finished in : 3 min 53 sec
Timestamp : 2018-08-26 01:53:36 GMT+8
Results : /root/superbench.log
———————————————————————-
Share result:
· http://www.speedtest.net/result/7581107348.png
· https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/VB7THtj2Xq/
———————————————————————